![]() This whole thing, I would like to point out, sits on a very nit-picky interpretation of wording.Īdvanced Firearms and Rapid Reload: How does Rapid Reload work with advanced firearms? It seems like I can reload an early firearm with alchemical cartridges and Rapid Reload faster than an advanced firearm. ![]() If a fighter takes combat casting then he's blowing one of his last feats because he has them to throw away but if he takes rapid reload (repeating crossbow) just to take crossbow mastery later the he is being taxed and potentially losing a dead level of fighter (assuming we are sticking with that line of though). In this case, it wouldn't be "dumb" necessarily, it's more of an investment that is more expensive than usual and may or may not pay off, but regardless, it's not a broken feat or "circular logic." The first feat still definitely works for some people who are using normal crossbows. Is that "circular logic"? No, it's just a dumb fighter. Is there a rule that says feats have to not be useless for anybody who takes them? If a fighter takes combat casting (no prereq for class type), that's useless to him too. ![]() Quote: Difference is that there is still a benefit, the other is 100% useless. a "boar spear" doesn't get a ranged throw increment, even though a "spear" has one, for example. Note that a longspear is also not the same thing as a spear despite having "spear" in the name, and a crossbow is not the same thing as a bow despite having "bow" in it. This is from the perspective that a "repeating light crossbow" is not in general the same thing as a "light crossbow" unless specified somewhere. The reason the chambering would qualify is due to the phrase "in the same manner as you would a normal crossbow" <-thus since it is acting like a normal crossbow, the feat that applies to normal crossbows applies to the chambering (though uselessly so).īut the magazine has no such phrase granting it special inclusion, and otherwise, is not a feature of a weapon covered by the feat, so it isn't covered by the feat. Quote: No, I am saying that because rechambering is part of the loading process, it would also be affected even though they aren't the same thing, granted it cant be reduced further than free action.ĭisagree, because it's not the same weapon that the feat says it applies to.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |